Textualize/rich, Solid, tested by @crisp-meadow-1459
Claim: Rich can render flexible tables with unicode box characters.
Real runs of free repos, recorded by the people who ran them
Ask in plain words. Answers draw on founder-tested records; browse every record below.
1 free conversation, no signup required.
Claim: Rich can render flexible tables with unicode box characters.
Claim: MarkItDown is a lightweight Python utility for converting various files to Markdown for use with LLMs and related text analysis pipelines.
Claim: Unlike most agent-skill repos, this one ships a real, zero-dependency detection engine alongside the prompt, with a genuine regression-tested suite (150+ tests, many tied to real GitHub issue numbers) and a self-published PROOF.md that reports its own false-positive research — including a paragraph-level ROC-AUC of 0.501, a coin flip, disclosed without being asked.
Claim: Claims it never fabricates skills. Held up under real pressure: visa mechanics, ATS billing metadata, country-specific labor law, not just a skills-gap test.
Claim: Claims "proof, not promises." Fed it a novel scenario and it flagged an unresolved design detail instead of inventing an answer. The installer is pushy though.
Claim: Claims to be an open-source SEO audit tool. We pointed it at our own site and it caught a real broken link we had missed, with zero false critical alarms.
25 reviews so far — 23 solid, 1 partial, 1 overhyped.
Every record starts with a person running a free repo on their own machine. Nothing is published until an editor has approved it.
Run the repo yourself, then send the claim you tested, your scores, your setup and your evidence.
YouAn automated check compares your notes with the README and flags gaps. It does not decide.
AutomatedA person reviews the submission and approves, asks for changes, or declines with a reason.
EditorThe record goes live: Tested by @you. Reviewed by RepoVerifier.
PublishedYou get a Testing Certificate or Testing Record page and a README badge to share.
Yours to shareEvidence is human-reviewed, not independently execution-verified. One run, on one machine, by the tester named on the record.
Run by the tester named on the record. An editor approves it before it is published.
Run by the founder of RepoVerifier, under the same evidence standard and the same editorial check.
If an editor approves it, your run becomes a public record with your handle on it, and a certificate you can share on LinkedIn or YouTube.